Analysis of Difference between the Narrated Texts of the Same Jurisprudential Hadith from the Perspective of Sahib Javaher
Author: Not specified
Jurisprudential
hadiths, as a treasury of divine words, have suffered from various damages
including difference between the narrated texts of the same hadith. Sahib
Javaher is among those jurists who have paid special attention to such hadiths.
In order to know Sahib Javaher's approach to this issue, it is necessary to find
his answers to the following questions: is there a principle under which there
is difference between the narrated texts of the same jurisprudential hadith?
What are the causes of difference in the narrated texts of the same hadith?
What are the stages of the examination of a hadith narrated with different
texts? What are the consequences and applications and reasons of preferring a
report of a hadith with
different narrated texts? The
present paper, using a descriptive-analytical method, has concluded that:
first, from the viewpoint of Sahib Javaher, principally, the text of a
jurisprudential hadith is unique. Second, the mistake of narrators and scribes
are two main causes of such a difference. Third, Sahib Javaher has treated a
hadith with different narrated texts in four stages: identification of
difference between the narrated texts of the same hadith, differentiation
between the different narrations of the same hadith, in the form of affirmative
particular proposition and affirmative universal proposition, preferring
one of the reports, abandonment or the probability of option in case of the
application of the narrations related to the resolution of